Prediction of Laura Cilekova [] vs Nadezhda Shamenkova [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W L L W W L L L W L
Form
W L L L L L L L W LHead-To-Head: Cilekova 1 - 0 Shamenkova
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cilekova winning 2 and Shamenkova winning 0. The last match between Cilekova and Shamenkova was at the W15 Trnava, 25-09-2024, First, I.hard with Laura Cilekova getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Laura Cilekova | 1 |
Nadezhda Shamenkova | 0 |
Cilekova | Stats | Shamenkova |
---|---|---|
43% (3-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (1-2) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
N/A | Ranking | N/A |
Highest Rank | ||
19 | Age | 17 |
- | Plays | - |
0 | Titles | 0 |
46% (43-50) | Career Total W/L | 27% (3-8) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Cilekova VS Shamenkova H2H Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-0 |
![]() ![]()
Laura Cilekova
Player
Nadezhda Shamenkova
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
62
Total Points Won
31
|
Cilekova VS Shamenkova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 1 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:5:0 | Average Match Time | 1:5:0 |
65% (35/54) | 1st Serve % | 64% (25/39) |
66% (23/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 40% (10/25) |
68% (13/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 21% (3/14) |
71% (5/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/5) |
67% (26/39) | Return Points Win % | 33% (18/54) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Laura Cilekova vs Nadezhda Shamenkova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Cilekova 1 - 0 Shamenkova
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cilekova has won 34.44% of points on their second serve, while Shamenkova has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cilekova, in recent form, has won 43.75% of their opponent's second serve points, while Shamenkova has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.4% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cilekova has saved 45.59% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shamenkova has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cilekova has won 38.71% of matches played (W/L 12/ 19), with Shamenkova winning 27.27% (W/L 3/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cilekova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 27% (W/L 3/ 8). Shamenkova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Cilekova has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40.91% of matches (W/L 9/ 13), where as Shamenkova has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 27.27% of matches (W/L 3/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cilekova winning 1 times and Shamenkova being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cilekova winning 2 and Shamenkova winning 0. The last match between Cilekova and Shamenkova was at the W15 Trnava, 25-09-2024, First, I.hard with Laura Cilekova getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cilekova and Shamenkova have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cilekova winning 0 times and Shamenkova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cilekova winning 0, and Shamenkova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cilekova has played against opponents with an average rank of 174.19 while Shamenkova has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cilekova has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shamenkova has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cilekova has converted 36.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shamenkova has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Laura Cilekova vs Nadezhda Shamenkova Best Odds For The Match
Laura Cilekova Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Hina Inoue
Player
Laura Cilekova
50%
(
17 of
34)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
49
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Laura Cilekova
Player
Aleksandra Mateva
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
68%
(
28 of
41)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Camilla Gennaro
Player
Laura Cilekova
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
50%
(
19 of
38)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Laura Cilekova
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Elina Nepliy
Player
Laura Cilekova
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
17
47%
(
26 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
38%
(
8 of
21)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
42 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Laura Cilekova
Player
Eva Maria Ionescu
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
51%
(
56 of
110)
4
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
6
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
110)
109
Total Points Won
102
|
2-6 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Laura Cilekova
Player
Rinko Matsuda
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Valeriya Olyanovskaya
Player
Laura Cilekova
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
6
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Radka Zelnickova
Player
Laura Cilekova
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Laura Cilekova
Player
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
74%
(
105 of
141)
1st Serve %
61%
(
73 of
119)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
53%
(
56 of
105)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
49%
(
69 of
141)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
119)
128
Total Points Won
132
|
1-6 7-6(1) 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Nadezhda Shamenkova Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 2-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 1-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Laura Cilekova
Player
Nadezhda Shamenkova
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
62
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nela Charvatova
Player
Nadezhda Shamenkova
61%
(
76 of
125)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
5
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
49%
(
24 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
47%
(
59 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
109
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF | 1-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H |
view more
Where To Watch Cilekova vs Shamenkova?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Cilekova Vs Shamenkova is now available here.

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
46% (43/50) | Win/Loss | 27% (3/8) |
46% (93/109) | Sets Win/Loss | 31% (8/18) |
48% (872/931) | Games Win/Loss | 41% (97/142) |
0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
58 | Aces Total | 0 |
0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
324 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
1:12:55 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
149.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 0 |
66% (3026/4551) | 1st Serve % | 57% (67/117) |
56% (1694/3026) | 1st Serve Win % | 43% (29/67) |
40% (613/1525) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (19/50) |
50% (295/587) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (6/21) |
47% (2147/4555) | Return Points Win % | 43% (77/179) |
48% (43/90) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 27% (3/11) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
58% (7/12) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
63% (12/19) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (2/4) |
85% (39/33) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
15% (39/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
19% (54/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (9/2) |
See recent tennis photos of Cilekova and Shamenkova
Other Predictions
- Loading news...